PINE CITY, Minn. – Statues of the Virgin Mary and portraits of Jesus loom over Louis Brouillard in his small apartment. He lives alone, two blocks from Pine City Elementary School and across the street from St. Mary’s Catholic preschool — close enough to hear children’s laughter when they play at recess.continue at USA Today
The retired priest no longer wears a collar, but the people in this small town an hour north of Minnesota’s Twin Cities still call him "Father." He is 96 years old.
Brouillard's peaceful life stands in stark contrast to the torment of 122 men and two women – all middle-age or retired now — who accuse him of sexually molesting them as children on the island of Guam. They have broken long-held silences and filed lawsuits. Some have protested and begged for justice. Somehave left the church.
A long time ago, some of them complained. Brouillard confessed, and was told to pray and try harder. Eventually, the island's Catholic church simply sent Brouillard away.
Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle. 2 Thes 2:15
Showing posts with label Maybe SNAP is right. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maybe SNAP is right. Show all posts
Priest accused in 124 Guam sex abuse cases ages quietly, alone
With Sacred Heart lawsuit, questions over whether parishes are liable in SNAP trials
A Twin Cities attorney and Diocese of Crookston monsignor say they want the same thing: healing and justice for survivors of clergy sexual abuse.
But where attorney Mike Finnegan and Monsignor Mike Foltz differ is who should be sued in the latest wave of lawsuits related to the recent May 25 deadline of the Minnesota Child Victims Act.
...
"If the priest is dead, for example, you could say, 'Well shucks, what's the reason to file the lawsuit if he can't hurt somebody else?' And the first response from virtually every victim I've ever spoke to is ... to deter coverups in the future," said David Clohessy, director of Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, or SNAP, a nonprofit that helps survivors of clergy sexual abuse.
...
"What's been happening more recently is the diocese, when we haven't sued (the parish), they've gone into court and said, 'He's not our guy. He's the parish's guy. The parish is the one who pays him. The parish is the one where he lives. And so, we don't have anything to do with him. We're not responsible,' " Finnegan said. [I'd like to see the case he references. If so, the diocesan claim is absolutely reprehensible. Or is this a straw man argument? Religious order priests is a different question, but a diocesan priest was said to not fall under the jurisdiction of a diocese?]...The Catholic Church isn't the only institution dealing with child sexual abuse cases across the country. The Minneapolis Children's Theatre is facing lawsuits alleging abuse dating back to the 1970s, and the Boy Scouts of America has allegations from decades ago against it, too.
MinnSt.Paul Archdiocese's list shows it kept secret seven priests credibly accused of sexually abusing children
The Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis acknowledged Thursday that it had kept secret for decades the names of at least seven Catholic priests it considers credibly accused of sexually abusing children.continue at MPR
Archbishop John Nienstedt revealed the names on a list of 34 priests posted to an archdiocese website. The names are from a list the archdiocese created in 2009 of priests accused of child sexual abuse. However, Nienstedt now says four of the priests should not have been included.
• Breaking news: Archdiocese names 30 priests linked to child sexual abuse over six decades
Three-fourths of the priests on the list are already known to the public through lawsuits and media reports. The 34 priests served in nearly half of the archdiocese’s parishes.
"These disclosures being made now, and the changes in our disclosure practices generally, are part of a comprehensive and cohesive set of actions we have been taking here in the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis this fall to address the issues associated with clergy sexual misconduct," Nienstedt said in a statement.
I have a half baked recap somewhere in the drafts. Summary, it's bad news, and SNAP's golddiggin.
Photo
Recap of a series of unfortunate events in Minneapolis St. Paul
I will attempt to recap
Copies of Hugo priest's alleged porn turned over to police
Mother alleges wider church coverup of clergy sexual misconduct
Here is a list of the recent Vicar Generals of the Archdiocese.
Fr. Kevin McDonough 1991-2008
Father Lee Piche' Apr 2008 to Jun 30, 2009;
Father Paul Sirba July 2009 to December 2009
Father Peter Laird December 2009 to September 2013
Fr. Piche became an Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese on May 27, 2009
Well okay. So at this time Shelley is still innocent and waiting upon further review of this "new evidence." If it is indeed some popup ad that is in question, I just really don't think that qualifies as criminal behavior. On the other hand, if it is true that he destroyed evidence and Laird KNEW that he destroyed it, and possibly withheld that information from police(or maybe there's nothing they could do about it)..... Let's say this, I think we all have this great fear that diocesan politics is very much like politics at the country club. They take care of their own and to hell with any outsiders. Compliance to the Dallas Charter doesn't mean sh** if that's all protecting children means in the country club. The fear is that dioceses are more worried about law suit protection than child protection. With Sirba, this could be exactly the mentality we are afraid of, BUT I think that the media is all too excited to blow this up as well so read every report with a grain of salt.
Just make sure we are compliant and there is an adult along is not enough. Someone's got to be the a-hole and kick a priest to the curb if he presents a serious threat to kids, I don't care if that leave a parish without a priest or if the bishop or vicar general went to school with him and it just isn't nice to pry into things like that. Someone has to get their hands dirty when there's a mess to clean up.
Update:
I should add this
And don't forget this:
Nienstedt’s top deputy resigned abruptly Thursday in response to an allegation that he covered up evidence of child pornography on a computer owned by a Hugo priest[Fr. Jonathan Shelley].SNAP actually has a nice list of relevant documents to this case.
The accusation came from attorney Jennifer Haselberger, a former high-ranking lay official within the archdiocese. And it followed her earlier accusation that the archdiocese overlooked for nearly a decade the sexual compulsions of another priest — Curtis Wehmeyer of St. Paul — and did not warn parishioners. Wehmeyer is now in prison, convicted of sexually abusing two boys.
Haselberger declined requests for comment last week, but on Saturday she issued a blunt challenge to Nienstedt.
She said in a statement that she resigned as chancellor for canonical affairs in April because church leaders’ refusal to act on her allegations made it “impossible for me to continue in that position given my personal ethics, religious convictions and sense of integrity.’’
Haselberger called for Nienstedt to order a comprehensive external review of the clergy and that he make public the names of all those who have engaged in acts of sexual misconduct or could reasonably be assumed to pose a threat to children.
“Until this occurs, I do not believe that it can be said that the Archdiocese is honoring its promise to protect,’’ Haselberger concluded.
Copies of Hugo priest's alleged porn turned over to police
Haselberger told police she had seen an investigator's report that child porn images were on Shelley's hard drive. But discs turned over to police contained only adult pornography. On Sunday, St. Paul police closed their investigation for lack of evidenceHere's what they did find, which is why police dismissed charges
None of what Ternus saw was child pornography, he said.
In a separate memo, dated Jan. 27, 2013, the Rev. Kevin McDonough, who headed the Church's child-safety program, told Nienstedt that at least four of the images were "quite likely of minors." He found no need to take further action because "the images themselves were not pornographic, but enticements to take a further step to view pornography" and appeared to be pop-up advertisements. "Were Father Shelley to have clicked on such advertisements, he would likely have been caught in a law-enforcement sting," McDonough wrote. [Which is really what it had boiled down to until recently]Nienstedt drafted letter to Vatican about porn on Hugo priest's computer, report says
In another document obtained by a radio reporter, Haselberger discloses her concern, as expressed to Nienstedt, about the Shelley case. In a letter to the archbishop in May 2012, Haselberger said the archdiocese in 2004 asked Shelley to allow church officials to examine two personal computers.St. Paul police reopen Hugo priest child porn investigation
"When he received that request, Father Shelley immediately destroyed one of the computers, and while he initially indicated he would permit an analysis of the third computer, he changed his mind and never provided the archdiocese with access to it," Haselberger wrote. [I've read a bunch, and it's not clear who knew that he had destroyed a computer]
Police have received "several pieces of new information" about the allegations involving porn on a computer hard drive, police spokesman Howie Padilla said Tuesday. "Today we decided it is imperative for us to reopen the investigation," he said. Padilla said he would not elaborate on what was in the files or the source of the information.Nienstedt orders independent review of church handling of clergy sexual abuse
"On Friday, we received information from an individual, not necessarily an individual connected with the archdiocese," Padilla said.
Archbishop John Nienstedt announced Sunday that he's asked a University of St. Thomas law professor and priest to assemble a task force to study how the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis is handling clergy sexual misconduct.And then this comes up too:
A letter sent by the archdiocese to parish priests said addressing the allegations is "the top priority for the archdiocese."
The archdiocese urged priests to announce at mass this weekend that Nienstedt has appointed the Rev. Reginald Whitt, a Dominican priest and University of St. Thomas law professor, to lead the creation of a task force to review all issues related to clergy misconduct. Whitt will appoint a task force of lay people but will not be a member of the group. The letter said the board will make specific recommendations and will release the report to the public.
Mother alleges wider church coverup of clergy sexual misconduct
A day after Duluth Bishop Paul Sirba told parishioners that he is “completely committed” to assisting victims of clergy sexual misconduct, a St. Paul mother accused him of participating in a coverup involving a priest who abused two of her boys.There was some question if he was ever Vicar General, which he was:
“There’s nothing Catholic about it. There’s nothing Christian about it. There’s nothing decent about it,” the mother said Monday in an interview with the Star Tribune.
She was referring in part to a phone call she received from Sirba in 2009, when he was vicar general of the St. Paul-Minneapolis Archdiocese.
She said Sirba called her after learning that one of her boys had gone camping alone with the Rev. Curtis Wehmeyer, who later was convicted of sexually abusing the child and his brother. The mother said Sirba told her to make sure another adult was present on any future trips — but that he said the gist of his message was that supervision was needed to protect priests from the appearance of scandal.
[bad. very bad.]
Here is a list of the recent Vicar Generals of the Archdiocese.
Fr. Kevin McDonough 1991-2008
Father Lee Piche' Apr 2008 to Jun 30, 2009;
Father Paul Sirba July 2009 to December 2009
Father Peter Laird December 2009 to September 2013
Fr. Piche became an Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese on May 27, 2009
Well okay. So at this time Shelley is still innocent and waiting upon further review of this "new evidence." If it is indeed some popup ad that is in question, I just really don't think that qualifies as criminal behavior. On the other hand, if it is true that he destroyed evidence and Laird KNEW that he destroyed it, and possibly withheld that information from police(or maybe there's nothing they could do about it)..... Let's say this, I think we all have this great fear that diocesan politics is very much like politics at the country club. They take care of their own and to hell with any outsiders. Compliance to the Dallas Charter doesn't mean sh** if that's all protecting children means in the country club. The fear is that dioceses are more worried about law suit protection than child protection. With Sirba, this could be exactly the mentality we are afraid of, BUT I think that the media is all too excited to blow this up as well so read every report with a grain of salt.
Just make sure we are compliant and there is an adult along is not enough. Someone's got to be the a-hole and kick a priest to the curb if he presents a serious threat to kids, I don't care if that leave a parish without a priest or if the bishop or vicar general went to school with him and it just isn't nice to pry into things like that. Someone has to get their hands dirty when there's a mess to clean up.
Update:
I should add this
Sirba also has recently been in the news for his role as vicar general of the St. Paul-Minneapolis Archdiocese, where he has been criticized for his handling of allegations of sexual abuse by Farther Curtis Wehmeyer and another priest whose computer was found to contain pornography, including apparent depictions of underage children involved in sex acts.Duluth Trib
The bishop stated, in an interview (in the Minneapolis Star Tribune published Tuesday), that he did not knowingly participate in any cover-up and that he reached out to the victims’ mother for the protection of her children.”
And don't forget this:
A total of six court hearings seeking the release of secret lists, involving every diocese in Minnesota, are slated for this fall, with additional actions targeting about a dozen Catholic religious orders in Minnesota, said St. Paul [SNAP] attorney Jeff Anderson, who is leading the effort.
Release of the full tally, which might run to dozens of priests facing credible allegations of abuse, could ignite an entirely new round of accusations and lawsuits at a time when many Catholics thought the worst of the clergy sex abuse tragedy was behind the church.
In the past, the courts have sided with the church on the issue because Minnesota’s statute of limitations gave child sexual abuse victims only until age 24 to take legal action. [Boom, there it is. He's off looking for another cash cow to prosecute dead priests.]
But a state law that took effect in May gives victims older than 24 a three-year window to sue for past abuse. Anyone younger than 24 has unlimited time to take legal action.
Dad29: SNAP Is Right About Sklba
![]() |
| A headbutt follows? |
SNAP's presser following the doc-dump on pedophile priests in Milwaukee:Dad29
...Sklba’s fingerprints are spread over nearly a quarter of a century of child sex crimes. Yet, he continues to hold a prominent role in the life of the Archdiocese, presiding at confirmations, masses at the cathedral, and living comfortably and well.
At a bare minimum, Sklba should gracefully bow out of public life in the Archdiocese like Weakland has, and be grateful he has not been prosecuted—as he should be—for criminal conspiracy. And if he doesn’t do that — it’s time for his boss, Jerome Listecki, to do it for him.”...
Absolutely correct.
Not to mention that awkward, glorious sendoff from the archdiocesan newspaper....
Photo
Green Bay Diocese claims First Amendment violated for right to assign pedophile to parish
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Green Bay says its First Amendment rights protect it from liability in a civil lawsuit filed by two childhood victims of clergy sex abuse.[....I can't believe this]continue at Post Crescent
Brothers Todd and Troy Merryfield were awarded $700,000 in May by an Outagamie County Court that found the diocese committed civil fraud. The brothers claimed the diocese knew of the Rev. John Feeney’s illicit sexual history when it installed him as a priest at Freedom’s St. Nicholas Church and misrepresented him as safe while knowing he was a danger to children.
The Merryfields, then 12 and 14, were molested by Feeney in 1978. Feeney was sentenced to prison in 2004 for the assaults.
Sarah Fry Bruch, an attorney for the diocese, said the jury verdict should be overturned, arguing the court is constitutionally barred from reading any meaning into Feeney’s assignment to a pastoral role. The Merryfields didn’t show evidence the diocese represented Feeney as safe.
“Nor could they, as the assignment of a priest is a canonical act which the civil courts may not evaluate or explain,” she wrote. The First Amendment gives broad latitude to religious organizations in the conduct of their internal affairs.
.... so hypothetically, said diocese assigns a member of the KKK to an all black parish and he kills several of the parishioners. Diocese claims that civil lawsuits for their own misconduct do no apply????? I'm speechless.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


