Statement of the Diocese of La Crosse on the Umberger Lake Delton incident

Still out in the middle of nowhere.  The fish are not cooperating.  Did see some Aurora Borealis last night.  Once I'm back in the saddle I'm hoping to get a copy of the police report RE Fr Umberger incident in the Dells.   If you know where I can find a copy please let me know.  Glad to see this was circulated by the diocesan administrator to help clear up some of this.
There is a general perception that the Diocese of La Crosse knew far more than it actually did regarding what transpired on July 22, 2009 at the water park in Lake Delton. The first and only knowledge the Diocese had of the Lake Delton matter was when it received a mailed copy of the Lake Delton Police Report consisting of five (5) pages. It was received by the Diocese seven weeks after July 22, 2009 on September 8, 2009 and it did not contain any written statements from Noah’s Ark staff, including the now widely published Noah’s Ark report of April 28, 2010 or any other additional information. No other law enforcement contact was made to the Diocese. The report states, among other things, that there were no complaints from any children and no evidence of improper activity that could amount to a crime despite Father Umberger’s complete cooperation including a consented search of his car, his person and the restroom in question. The report did not allege any interaction or suspicious activity with children in or outside the restroom. The only thing the Diocese knew at the time was that there was mere suspicion but no evidence of any crime or other wrong doing. 

The Diocese specifically was not aware that Father Umberger had contact with any children or that he had been placed on any watch list by Noah’s Ark.

The report further specifically indicated that the matter was referred to the Onalaska Police Department and the Wisconsin Dells Police Department for follow-up. By policy and practice, the Diocese refers and defers to law enforcement. It steps back and waits for law enforcement to complete its investigation. There was no cover up. The information came from law enforcement. Previously, the Diocese was criticized for not referring to law enforcement and conducting its own investigation which might interfere with the police investigation. Upon receipt of the report, the Diocese immediately contacted Father Umberger and questioned him about the matter. The Diocese had no knowledge of any prior complaints. An investigation was made to verify Father Umberger’s explanation and it was confirmed. The Diocese had no knowledge of and did not learn of Father Umberger’s access to any pornography, attraction to children or other moral infractions.

Subsequently, the Diocese received no information of any conduct of a sexual nature until his arrest on July 14, 2010. Records previously requested and first produced from law enforcement on July 29, 2010 (one year and seven days after the Lake Delton incident), now reveal that law enforcement was revisiting the Lake Delton matter in April of 2010. No one contacted or alerted the Diocese to that effect.

The Diocese was shocked and saddened to learn on July 14, 2010 of Father Umberger’s arrest and charge of possession of child pornography, of his reported statements of improper attraction to children and other moral infractions.

The Diocese followed its protocols, deferred to law enforcement and acted upon the information it was provided.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Lake Delton Police report is now linked to on the same page as this statement, directly under the photo of Umberger.

Sorry, but I don't buy it.

I KNOW they asked him more questions than those related to his prostate.
The police report makes it obvious what was assumed....(not too difficult to read between the lines on this one) and people really believe that they just left it at that?
uhuh

I'm convinced they're just not telling the whole truth.
And they likely never will.

Anonymous said...

What is the "now widely published Noah’s Ark report of April 28, 2010"? (quote from the Diocesan statement above.)

Anonymous said...

I think it is the report produced by the Noah's Ark staff that has more of the detail of the water park's information about the incident. As for "widely published", I have been searching online and couldn't find it. Since its a business, it probably can't be obtained through a Freedom of Information Act like the police reports.

Badger Catholic said...

... I'm not going to believe a story with no evidence to support it. So the Dells, state police, and the diocese of La Crosse are conspiring to save Fr. Umberger?? Why the hell would they do that?

Anonymous said...

I think the diocese is protecting the diocese...no more, no less.

Fr. John Mary, ISJ said...

I do disagree, anonymous.
The M.O. of those who are addicted to porno, and very much more, those who are addicted to child porno, are in such states of denial, that unless he confessed to the Diocesan officials, nothing could be "pinned" on him.
That he made these horrendous admissions to the police, makes my head spin.
That is "confessional matter"...what the hell was he thinking?
It sounds to me, and I could be wrong (I often am) that he was bragging, or, maybe he wanted to "let it all loose", which without a lawyer and not in the "internal forum" is now part of the public record for all of us to read and have to deal with.
And that is as sick as I can register.
I'll curtail my comments here, as I don't want to sin nor do I want to scandalize the faithful.
Fr. U. needs not only help but a good kick in the behind...he betrayed his pledge as a priest in many ways...but I do believe he lied to the people in the Diocese (Fr, Hirsch, Msgr. Gilles, Mr. Biranbaum, the Bishop) and God help him.
He's gonna need it.
I'm more concerned with the people of St. Patrick Parish, the Middle Schools he was involved with, and the people who love him and have supported him.
May Jesus and Mary help them all.
What a tragic and sick mess we are in here!

Anonymous said...

That's OK. We can agree to disagree.
I appreciate your responses.

Please read (and perhaps post) this editorial also written by a member of St. Patrick's parish in Onalaska, James Kroner.
He's stating what I apparently have been unable to express to you.

(Converted to a 'tiny url' via tinyurl.com)

http://tinyurl.com/2aj74xg

Anonymous said...

oops...My apology Nazarethpriest....I read and responded too quickly:(

I was assuming that your comment was that of Badger Catholic, hence the suggestion to publish the editorial by Mr. Kroner.

I do appreciate your response, however, and I offer that we, too, can agree to disagree.

May I also suggest that you read the same editorial referred to in my last post?

Anonymous said...

OK, I seem to be having some trouble posting this time.

I'll try it again.

I appreciate your response, and I offer that we can agree to disagree.

I'd like to suggest that all read the following editorial by a member of St. Patrick's parish in Onalaska, published today.

http://tinyurl.com/2aj74xg

In this editorial, Mr. Kroner has expressed what I apparently was unable to.