WASHINGTON, D.C., April 12, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Excommunication of Catholic politicians backing taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood can only happen if bishops institute a specific law or penalty to that effect, says a prominent American canon lawyer.The rest at LifeNews
American Life League (ALL), the country’s largest Catholic pro-life organization, last week called for the excommunication of the 62 Catholic congressmen who voted in February against defunding America’s largest abortion provider. The group pointed out that the Catholic Church has a history of excommunicating those who support its greatest enemies, including supporters of Freemasonry, Nazism, and communism.
Commenting on the proposal, Dr. Edward Peters, who holds the Edmund Cardinal Szoka Chair at Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, and serves as a consultant to the Vatican’s highest court, emphasized that a local bishop or the national bishops’ conference would probably have to lay down a specific law allowing for excommunication of those backing Planned Parenthood, because such conduct is not covered by the Church’s universal law.
ALL notes that the German bishops laid down such a law in the case of the Nazis and their supporters, for example.
“ALL identifies a serious pastoral problem, namely, Catholic legislative support for a thoroughly evil organization, Planned Parenthood, and they suggest a measure that the Church can take in response to such legislators, namely, excommunication,” Peters told LifeSiteNews. “ALL is quite within their rights to make that case.”
Such an action, however, “would almost certainly require the establishment of a new penal law and the specification of the penalty of excommunication with an eye toward enforcement against future actions,” he explained. “No canon currently penalizes any form of legislative activity per se by Catholics (even terrible actions as supporting Planned Parenthood).”
But even without a specific local law, Peters said that on a case-by-case basis bishops even now could consider invoking two canons that call for a “just penalty” – a penalty that can be tailored to the gravity of the offense - for a person who “gravely injures good morals” (c. 1369) or commits an external violation of a divine law where there’s a need to prevent scandal (c. 1399).
While these canons could eventually lead to excommunication, they “do not support invoking excommunication as their first resort,” he said. “These norms don’t have the ‘impact’ of excommunication, I grant, but some response might be better than the current no response to such conduct.”
I saw the ALL report but Peters has dealt with this in depth at his site, CanonLaw.info. I'm still one arming it but I remember reading some other pieces he has done on the subject. He has some additional thought at his blog, In Light of the Law.
2 comments:
"I'm still one arming it " -- I see blog posts by Baby BC in the near future! Sounds like a pre-emptive strike to me.
LOL
Post a Comment